9/11 Conspiracy

Hmm, I'm thinking hard about how to get into this topic. While I don't believe personally that the "government" set 9/11 portions in motion, I would believe outside influences within the US did (dare I say corporations). There is a whole lot of money to be gained by 9/11 at a global level...just look around. Also to set the record straight, no government in the world wants the US economy to fall on its @ss, if it did, the world would flow down the toilet with it. Just take a looks at how many foreign governments have huge, billions of dollars, tied in the US economy. (side note, take a look at the markets in the Middle East, some of the WORST markets in the world..I believe it was Saudi Arabia that just had their equivalent of Oct 29 1929)

I don't think the US economy is as important as it used to be, the Asian economy is just as strong in my opinion if not stronger. America would like to think the rest of the world needs them but it's not necessarily true... if it was there would be more countries rushing to support the US in its war on Terror, right now I think there is around a dozen countries. Switzerland is a perfect example of a self sustaining country... and I think we can all learn something from them.

the us needed a war on terror so it could get the oil pipe line throw afganistan as the tallban said no watch the first 10 mins of loose change & listen to the part on rebuilding americas defences .Anybody that want a dvd copy of loose change email me your name & address & i will post you it free. The swiss grew rich off of nazi gold plundered from the jews and every country they invaded during the ww2

Quote:

---

quote:Originally posted by deerslayer

the us needed a war on terror so it could get the oil pipe line throw afganistan as the tallban said no watch the first 10 mins of loose change & listen to the part on rebuilding americas defences .Anybody that want a dvd copy of loose change email me your name & address & i will post you it free. The swiss grew rich off of nazi gold plundered from the jews and every country they invaded during the ww2

---

America and the UK grew rich off slavery and plundering countries like India. I'm not sure what your point is.

Quote:

---

quote:Originally posted by KJ_innit

Quote:

---

quote:Originally posted by deerslayer

the us needed a war on terror so it could get the oil pipe line throw afganistan as the tallban said no watch the first 10 mins of loose change & listen to the part on rebuilding americas defences .Anybody that want a dvd copy of loose change email me your name & address & i will post you it free. The swiss grew rich off of nazi gold plundered from the jews and every country they invaded during the ww2

---

America and the UK grew rich off slavery and plundering countries like India. I'm not sure what your point is.

---

lol..
<puts on UN tin hat>

:D

im sorry ive held back but loose change is the biggest pile of tripe ive seen in a while this goes along way to show just how much bULL they spout on it http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/

everybody has an opinon

opionion is not fact i mean the ammount of stuff on lose change that is plain wrong is enough to discredit the whole thing threoys are nowt with out proof and i see no proof in loose change

research it yourself jason bermas i very thurough in his research why wont the us govt answere the question that the 9/11 familes are asking thhere have only been 3 steel framed buildings ever that have fallen down due to fire they all fell on 9/11 not since or before the truth is louder than words iam off to ground zero 9/11 this year as apart of 9/11 truth movement

so that would be why he got so much of it wrong; identifed the wrong engines used on the 757 contacted the wrong engine plants to identify the parts, confused the fact that a criuse missile could zig zag and pull up the lamp pots and move the genrator when it would have missed them all, took press sources form neo natzi holloacosut deniers news papers, i could go on ... and i will the owner of the twin towers has not gained billions in insrance payouts but lost near 3 billion in the re building procsse and subuqent rent on the land the planes couldnt have been intercepted as the us atlantic defence wall had been taken down since the end of the cold war, the mayor who was advised not to fly .... still got on his plane, no demaltion expert in the world has said it was anything but the planes and subsuqnet fire that caused the collapse of the twin towers as 1 no exlpions or flashes as showin in any other free fall controlled demolotin were there also no sizemic readings either confined the fact that the impact of the planes caused it he quotes numerous people on his film (who are they what is their feild of experies ?) the owner of the fligh school and confined that yes he wasnt the best piolt but there was no dout he could have pulled of the manover as it was not conducted well, also there are many document cases of steel frames buldings collapsing the twin towers were only steel skined allwoing for an open plan enviorment in the offices and therefore not as stong as many steel skined buildings becuse of the nature of the skin the incat of the plane caused the whole structaral effect to fail why did noe of the other buildings he menton collapse ? maybee beacuse there were not hit buy a 100 tonne aircarft moving at 500mph the truth of 11th 9th a sad day were many lost their lives as a result of alqeda not a us govermet plot