AndyP & Lenore
17th March 2007, 08:35 AM
Following on from Ian King's rolling road adventures....
As seen in this article on MINI2 (http://www.mini2.com/forum/2nd-gen-mini-cooper-s/137657-benchmark-r56-cooper-s.html) Lohen (NMS Sponsors) have tested their unmodified R56 Cooper S on three different rolling raods...
1) 204.8bhp - 195.9lbf.ft
2) 196.0bhp - 178.6lbf.ft
3) 195.4bhp - 197.1lbf.ft
All tests carried out with the same fuel in the tank.
So it seems Ian's car is not a unique specimen, but more par for the course. It looks like MINI are deliberately dropping the "stated" bhp for some reason.....One suggestion muted in the MINI2 thread is to make the car more insurable for younger drivers.
I don't suppose anyone is going to take their car back and complain under the Sale Of Goods act that the vehicle was not "as described".
A.:D
As seen in this article on MINI2 (http://www.mini2.com/forum/2nd-gen-mini-cooper-s/137657-benchmark-r56-cooper-s.html) Lohen (NMS Sponsors) have tested their unmodified R56 Cooper S on three different rolling raods...
1) 204.8bhp - 195.9lbf.ft
2) 196.0bhp - 178.6lbf.ft
3) 195.4bhp - 197.1lbf.ft
All tests carried out with the same fuel in the tank.
So it seems Ian's car is not a unique specimen, but more par for the course. It looks like MINI are deliberately dropping the "stated" bhp for some reason.....One suggestion muted in the MINI2 thread is to make the car more insurable for younger drivers.
I don't suppose anyone is going to take their car back and complain under the Sale Of Goods act that the vehicle was not "as described".
A.:D